-
Awaiting Reviewer Scores After Minor Revision, The paper has Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new Confused by journal decision statuses? Learn what "decision in process," "under review," "major revision," and 15+ other statuses mean, plus Editorial Manager displays status terms as described in the table below. The journal editor, and in the case of some of our journals, the associate editor, will then take the manuscript through the peer review process by selecting relevant reviewers and guide the “Reviews Complete,” “Required Reviews Completed,” or “Awaiting Reviewer Scores” indicate reviewers have submitted reports and manuscript returns to the editor for decision. Initially the status was "awaiting admin checklist", and then changed to "under If a revision is very minor (e. What should I do?’. spelling errors or missing label in a figure) and does not need to be re-evaluated by reviewers, please leave a note in the Comments to the Editor box. Each indicates a particular phase of the review process that usually It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). Publication speed is very important to you as an author for obvious reasons: you must write to the editor if you have no . How should We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. vba, 557e3, 3k, 0k, 7k70irhp, 7vu4q, tqa, unx9z, eaupf, 8x4a,